100% local and offline
The software installs on your workstations and runs with no connection. Your reports stay in your environments.
Industry · Dairy
Drying towers, tanks, exchangers, piping. All inspected every year. The reports land in a SharePoint or a CMMS and do not come back out as anything you can steer by. Integrity Loop puts those reports to work, equipment by equipment.
The dairy thesis
Your inspection reports are scattered site by site. Linked back to each piece of equipment, they become an asset-base health steered over time.
1 · SCATTERED
Linked to the asset
3 · STEERED · ASSET CONDITION
| EQUIPMENT | STATUS |
|---|---|
| Storage tank | Up to date |
| Pasteuriser | To schedule |
| Drying tower | Check due |
Traceable to the source report
A dairy plant produces a huge amount of inspection data, but very little steering. Integrity Loop imports your PDF reports and extracts the measurements, findings, deadlines and locations. Each item is linked to the piece of equipment it concerns: drying tower, tank, heat exchanger, piping.
From them it builds a per-asset history, a map of defects, health KPIs and an audit dossier ready in minutes. The software runs locally, off-cloud and offline, under your control.
Dairy industry
Sector context
Dairy processing runs in an almost permanent flow. Milk reception, pasteurisation, concentration, spray drying, packaging of powders and ingredients.
Every stage draws on tanks, heat exchangers, piping and pressure equipment. These assets face thermal cycles, repeated cleaning-in-place and abrasive products.
These assets are inspected regularly, both in-house and by non-destructive testing providers and inspection bodies. Thickness measurements, weld checks, visual examinations, pressure-equipment inspections: every campaign produces a report, most often a PDF.
Across a multi-site group, those reports pile up in SharePoints, CMMS systems and spreadsheets that are specific to each plant.
The result is familiar: the data exists in bulk, yet stays unreadable at asset-base scale. No one holds a consolidated view of equipment health. The deadlines coming up and the defects that recur across sites stay invisible.
The challenge is not to run more inspections, but to put the ones you already have to work.
Your dairy inspections already exist. What they lack is a memory and an asset-base view.
This page deals with the mechanical integrity of dairy equipment: corrosion, thicknesses, cracks, defects, deadlines. It does not cover food safety or hygiene standards, which belong to your quality processes.
Assets concerned
Integrity Loop tracks each equipment family through the reports you already hold. This sector view brings them together, within the scope your reports cover.
Atomisation and powder drying: internal abrasion, shell thicknesses, re-inspection points.
Milk tanks, process and storage vessels: corrosion, thicknesses and weld tracking.
Product, steam and cleaning-fluid circuits: thickness measurements and check points per line.
Pasteurisation and concentration: thermal fatigue, fouling, findings tracked campaign after campaign.
Storage of dairy powders: abrasion, wall wear, structure and singular points.
Dust collection on drying lines: casing condition, findings and inspection deadlines.
Steam generators and vessels: periodic inspection and requalification deadlines tracked per asset.
Powder separation at the tower outlet: abrasion and wall wear recorded in your reports.
Powder finishing and cooling: wear and fouling findings tracked in the history.
This page covers the dairy industry as a whole. Whatever the family of equipment, Integrity Loop works from the reports your teams and providers already produce.
The concrete challenges
These constraints show up in your inspection reports. They still have to be read at asset-base scale, over time and from one site to the next.
Repeated cleaning and sterilisation cycles stress welds and walls. Thermal fatigue shows up across successive findings.
Drying towers, cyclones and silos take the abrasion of powders. Thicknesses drop campaign after campaign.
Acid and alkaline cleaning agents, chlorides, condensates: corrosion advances and deserves thickness tracking over time.
Weld cracks, pitting, incipient flaws: without a per-equipment history, you cannot see that the same defect keeps coming back.
Major shutdowns are prepared well ahead. Without a view of deadlines and priorities, the schedule ends up decided in a rush.
Each provider delivers its own report format. Findings stay isolated instead of feeding a shared memory of the equipment.
Each of these constraints is already documented in your reports. What is missing is a per-equipment history and a multi-site view that make these signals comparable over time.
How Integrity Loop helps
The software does not carry out inspections. It does not replace your CMMS. It reads the reports your teams and providers already produce, then turns them into steering.
Who uses it
What you gain
Each gain described follows from a feature of the software. We promise no failure prediction, no remaining life and no automatic compliance.
In practice
IllustrationTake a dairy group with several plants. Each site has its drying towers, tanks, heat exchangers and piping inspected by its own providers.
The detailed reports live as PDFs, filed by campaign in each plant's SharePoint. Every manager knows their own asset base, but technical management only has summaries rebuilt by hand, late, and already out of date.
Once the report history is dropped into Integrity Loop, every finding is linked to its equipment and filed in a dated history.
Management gets a unified reading: which towers are losing thickness, which exchangers concentrate the findings. It also sees which pressure-equipment deadlines are coming up, and which defect recurs from one site to another.
The data has not changed source: it has simply become readable, comparable and retrievable.
An illustration of how it works on a generic case. It is not a quantified client result.
Comparing the approaches
The real question: how to re-read the inspections you already hold. Here is where each option sits for a dairy asset base.
| Criterion | Spreadsheets + SharePoint | CMMS alone | Provider summary | Integrity Loop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reads PDF reports | Manually | Rarely | Occasionally | By adapter, in bulk |
| Per-equipment history | Scattered | Work orders | For the assignment | Over ten years, per asset |
| Deadlines and overdue | Kept by hand | Variable | Out of scope | Tracked and flagged |
| Multi-site view | Very hard | Depends on setup | No | From group to site |
| Audit dossier | Rebuilt | Partial | On request | In minutes |
| Data handling | On your servers | Often cloud | At the third party | 100% local and offline |
Integrity Loop replaces neither the CMMS nor your inspection providers. It puts their reports to work to build an equipment memory and an asset-base view.
The scope
Deployment
Inspection data is sensitive. Integrity Loop handles it as close as possible to your environments, with no dependence on the cloud.
The software installs on your workstations and runs with no connection. Your reports stay in your environments.
Every measurement and every finding stays linked to the original PDF report, which stays viewable and verifiable.
Your tools and reports stay intact. The software reads the existing documents and produces a view of them.
The view extends site by site, from head office to each plant, without interrupting operations.
Frequently asked questions
No. Inspections and measurements stay in the hands of your teams and your non-destructive testing providers. The software imports their reports, extracts the data and links it to each piece of equipment to build a history and an asset-base health.
No. Integrity Loop is not a CMMS and does not replace one. It reads the PDF reports you already archive, with no migration and no change of tool. It holds the integrity memory of your equipment alongside your CMMS.
No. Integrity Loop handles the mechanical integrity of equipment: corrosion, thicknesses, cracks, defects, deadlines. Food safety belongs to your quality and hygiene processes, outside the scope of the software.
Every known format has a dedicated reading adapter that extracts its data. The software does no OCR. An unrecognised format is archived and flagged, never guessed, which protects the reliability of the history.
No. The software runs 100% locally, off-cloud and offline. Your reports stay on your workstations. Each item stays linked to the source PDF for full traceability, under your control.
Yes. The view is structured from group to site. Technical management sees asset-base health, deadlines and recurring defects from one site to the next. Each plant keeps the detail of its own equipment.
Our expertise
Going further
By the Assets 4.0 team · Published on 11 August 2026 · Updated on
The return on investment
Audit preparation time, deadlines kept, shutdowns better prepared: start from your own figures to estimate the gain.
Calculate the ROIIntegrity Loop turns the reports you accumulate, campaign after campaign. You get a readable asset-base health and an audit dossier ready in minutes.
AI for industry