100% local and sovereign
The software installs on your machines. Your inspection data stays there.
Industry · Pharmaceutical
Every check produces an inspection report. Integrity Loop ties those reports to your autoclaves, sterile tanks and pressure equipment. You build a history and you prepare your audits.
The integrity thesis
Scattered inspection reports, tied to each piece of equipment, become a history. The audit dossier is ready in a few minutes.
1 · SCATTERED
Linked to the asset
3 · STEERED · ASSET CONDITION
| EQUIPMENT | STATUS |
|---|---|
| Autoclave | Up to date |
| Aseptic vessel | To schedule |
| Sterile filter | Check due |
Traceable to the source report
The integrity of pharmaceutical assets is decided in the continuity of their monitoring, not only at audit time. Integrity Loop imports your inspection PDFs and analyses each one through an adapter calibrated for its format. Every measurement and finding is tied to the relevant piece of equipment.
You get a per-equipment history, health KPIs, tracked deadlines and an exportable audit dossier. The software runs 100% locally, off-cloud and offline, under your control.
Pharmaceutical industry
Sector context
A pharmaceutical site runs sterile, pressurised and steam processes. Every critical piece of equipment is inspected, checked and requalified throughout its life. Autoclaves, sterile tanks, steam generators and utility piping generate a constant flow of reports.
These reports come from several sources: in-house teams, inspection bodies, non-destructive testing providers. They arrive as PDFs, in formats specific to each contributor. They end up filed site by site, often in a document system or a shared folder.
So the data exists in abundance. What is missing is a reading per piece of equipment:
Across a multi-site group, inspection reports already exist in bulk. They stay under-used for lack of being tied to each piece of equipment, site after site.
Assets covered
Tracking covers the equipment for which you receive usable inspection reports. The scope covers in particular pressure vessels, steam and utilities.
Repeated steam cycles, seals and pressurised chambers: every check joins the unit's history.
Surface findings, welds and nozzle points tracked over time, report after report.
Thicknesses, corrosion and defects logged per vessel, with their location on the equipment.
Steam, purified-water and process lines, with tracking of wall thinning and singular points.
Tube bundles and shells: inspection findings stay attached to the tracked unit.
Pressure equipment at the heart of utilities: deadlines and findings consolidated per unit.
Autoclaves, steam generators and vessels fall under in-service monitoring. Integrity Loop gathers the findings per unit and makes deadlines visible.
Integrity challenges
These phenomena are documented in inspection reports. The problem is tracking them piece by piece, over time and across sites.
Thickness readings only make sense in series, compared from one check to the next.
Thermal or mechanical initiations to spot early and track location by location.
Flow and turbulence zones to watch, with a history that brings recurrences to light.
Repeated clean-in-place and sterilisation stress surfaces: their effects read over time.
Every technical shutdown demands knowing quickly which equipment to treat first, and why.
Each contributor returns its report in its own format: the history scatters fast.
The inspection data exists. What is missing is its reading per piece of equipment.
The Integrity Loop answer
Integrity Loop reads what your teams and providers produce. Each report joins its equipment, then a history and a dashboard. Explore Integrity Loop.
Data extracted
Extraction stays faithful to the source. A field absent from the report stays empty, with no invented value.
The approach
You start from your current reports. Each step produces a usable deliverable, without changing your field tools or re-entering the data.
You drop in your inspection PDFs, file by file or as a whole folder, in their original format.
Each report is analysed by the adapter for its format. An unknown format is archived and flagged.
Measurements and findings are tied to the relevant piece of equipment, once its identity is validated.
The per-equipment history builds up and defects are placed on a 2D map.
Per-asset health, regulatory deadlines and overdue items become visible on a dashboard.
The dossier is generated in a few minutes, with the source PDF linked, ready to export.
Users
Head office and the field start from the same data. Two levels of reading: the per-asset summary, the multi-site asset-base view.
What you bring, what you gain
Inputs: your current documents. Outputs: a reading per piece of equipment that inspection, maintenance and management use the same day.
In practice
IllustrationTake a multi-site pharmaceutical group. Its pressure-equipment and sterile-tank checks are rigorous. But the reports live in PDFs and shared folders, site by site. Each manager knows their own base. Technical management, for its part, rebuilds every audit dossier by hand.
By dropping the existing history into the software, each report is tied to its equipment. The audit dossier then gathers the per-asset history, the findings, the deadlines and the recommendations, with the source PDF linked. The data has not changed source: it has become readable, comparable and presentable.
An illustration of how it works on a generic case. It is not a quantified client result.
Regulatory framework
Many pharmaceutical assets are also pressure equipment. In France, the order of 20 November 2017 governs their in-service monitoring. It requires an operating file per piece of equipment and sets periodicities. Periodic inspection at most every six years, requalification in principle every ten years.
A reading per piece of equipment makes these deadlines visible before they arrive. It gathers findings per unit and makes keeping the file easier.
Integrity Loop helps consolidate these records and retrieve every check. It substitutes for neither the bodies, nor the standards, nor the inspection agents. Their certification falls to COFREND, under the EN ISO 9712 standard.
Its scope is the mechanical integrity of your equipment. It does not address good-manufacturing-practice compliance, process validation or computer-system validation.
Comparison of approaches
The point: tying what you already receive to each piece of equipment. Here is where each option sits.
| Criterion | Excel + folders | DMS / SharePoint | CMMS module | Integrity Loop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting point | Manual re-entry | File storage | Module to buy | Your PDF reports |
| Reading PDF reports | By hand | No | Rarely | By format adapter |
| Per-equipment history | Fragile | By search | Variable | Up to ten years |
| Deadlines and overdue | Manual tracking | No | Depends on module | Visible per asset |
| Audit dossier | Rebuilt by hand | To compile | Partial | Generated in minutes |
| Traceability to source PDF | Difficult | The file alone | Rare | Linked to each indicator |
| Hosting | Local | Often cloud | Often cloud | 100% local, offline |
Local deployment
The software installs on your machines. Your inspection data stays there.
Integrity Loop works without a connection. Processing happens as close as possible to your environments.
Every indicator stays linked to the original PDF, viewable and verifiable at any time.
A data point is tied only once the equipment's identity is validated, for a reliable history.
Scope
Going further
Frequently asked questions
No. Integrity Loop covers the mechanical integrity of your equipment. Good-manufacturing-practice compliance, process validation and computer-system validation stay outside its scope. It centralises inspection reports, builds a per-equipment history and prepares an audit dossier. Regulatory responsibility and validation stay on your side.
Integrity Loop doesn't use OCR. It analyses usable inspection PDFs through an adapter calibrated for each format. An image that is merely scanned, without usable text, is not guessed. It is archived and flagged. You know exactly what was read and what still needs checking before the audit.
The file is archived and flagged. It is not interpreted at random. Each known format has its own analysis adapter. A new format waits for an adapter to be added, which prevents invented data. This principle protects the reliability of the history and the traceability back to the source PDF.
No. Integrity Loop runs 100% locally, off-cloud and offline. Your inspection reports, the per-equipment history and the KPIs stay on your machines, under your control. Every indicator stays linked to its source PDF, which ensures traceability without exposing your data to the outside.
No. Integrity Loop is neither a CMMS, nor an EAM, nor a non-destructive testing instrument. It puts to work the inspection reports your teams and providers produce. It ties them to each piece of equipment and draws a history and deadlines from them. It complements your existing tools instead of replacing them.
Once reports are imported and tied to the equipment, the audit dossier is generated in a few minutes. It gathers the per-asset history, the findings, the deadlines and the recommendations, with the source PDF linked. You then export to Excel, PDF or CSV depending on the auditor's need.
Our expertise
Useful references
By the Assets 4.0 team · Published on 11 August 2026 · Updated on
The return on investment
Audit preparation time, deadlines met, shutdown prioritisation. Measure what per-equipment steering brings, from your own figures.
Calculate the ROIIntegrity Loop turns your reports into a per-asset history, tracked deadlines and an audit dossier ready to present, on-premise.
AI for industry